Archive for April, 2012

PBT: Rondo suspended for Game 2 vs. Hawks

Monday, April 30th, 2012

Celtics point guard Rajon Rondo will be suspended for Game 2 of their playoff series against the Hawks Tuesday night, the league announced. Celtics president Danny Ainge had confirmed the suspension to A. Sherrod Blakely of CSNNE.com minutes before the league made it official

“Rondo has been our best player and it obviously hurts us,” C’s president of basketball operations Danny Ainge, told CSNNE.com. “Someone else is going to have to step up and make it not as painful without Rondo out there.”

Rondo was thrown out late in Game 1 when he bumped official Marc Davis after arguing a call. The league rule calls for a one game suspension for any player that intentionally makes contact with a referee. The only way it couldn’t be a suspension is if it was considered an accident, and while Rondo stumbled it is clear his bump of the official is intentional.

Boston already lost Game 1 to Atlanta and winning Game 2 without Rondo will be a challenge. The alternative for Boston is going down 2-0 in the series, meaning they would need to win four of the final five games to win the series. A tall order against a quality Hawks team.

Article source: http://pheedo.msnbc.msn.com/click.phdo?i=30aa04e48395fc0af78a09e02082a6f8

Microsoft’s Nook deal is a real ‘game-changer’

Monday, April 30th, 2012

CNBC’s Jon Fortt reports on the partnership between Microsoft and Barnes Noble. Rafe Needleman, CNET editor-at-large, explains what this big bet could mean for Microsoft.

The idea of going into a bookstore and walking out with a tablet or other device might sound contradictory, but it could be the future for Barnes Noble (BKS). 

The bookseller announced this morning a plan to spin off its digital and college divisions into a subsidiary and partner with Microsoft  (MSFT) in a digital reading venture the two companies have dubbed Newco. The Windows creator will invest $300 million in return for a 17.6 percent equity stake in the new business. Goldman Sachs analyst Matthew Fassler called the deal a “game-changer.” 

Barnes Noble shares surged about 60 percent Monday on news. Microsoft shares were flat.

“To me, the key takeaway is this guarantees the long-term viability of the Nook,” said Bob O’Donnell, an analyst at IDC.

From a technology angle, it makes sense: Microsoft and Barnes Noble need each other to better compete in the e-reader and tablet business. Fassler wrote, “Our biggest concern for BKS has been its ability to compete against AAPL (Apple) and AMZN (Amazon), two of the deepest-pocketed players in the technology and media world. NewCo now has an equally deep-pocketed partner.”

(Msnbc.com is a joint venture of NBC Universal and Microsoft.)

Barnes Noble needs Microsoft’s global scale and money to grow its ebook business beyond the United States. Amazon has been aggressively rolling out its Kindle reader worldwide; it announced earlier this month that the Kindle Touch 3G is available in more than 175 countries. ”It appears strategic to Microsoft to put more skin in the game by partnering with BKS for digital content supply and creation for both the U.S. and international markets,” Nomura analyst Rick Sherlund wrote in response to the announcement.

Barnes Noble and Microsoft also have settled their patent litigation, the companies said.

Microsoft needs Barnes Noble’s presence on college campuses and its textbook business to help it compete against Apple’s educational offerings. “Microsoft will want to make sure that … there is a counter balance to Apple’s growing partnerships for content and creation of interactive educational content,” Sherlund wrote.  

It’s also a fascinating peek into what could be the future of the bookseller’s retail presence. The two companies confirmed the development of a Nook app for Windows 8 but didn’t offer any more details about whether or not the bookstores could become a sales channel for Microsoft. 

It’s an idea that could benefit both brands, though. Roughly two years ago, Barnes Noble gave its Nook e-reader a big push with spacious in-store kiosks that have been compared to the Apple store in concept and design. At the time, analysts praised the idea of letting people play around with the devices and ask knowledgeable salespeople how to use them. 

Even as the number of books read on tablets or e-readers increases, Barnes Noble seems committed to its physical stores, said Michael Norris, senior analyst of the Trade Books Group at Simba Information. “The actual value proposition of a physical store is clearly there,” he said, pointing out that Apple’s retail presence boosts its brand image as well as its sales figures.

Although the market for e-books continues to climb, analysts say paper books are never going to disappear entirely. The amount of store square footage needed to house this inventory will probably shrink, though, and Barnes Noble has an enormous real estate footprint. Filling it with more electronics could make sense. 

Microsoft has experimented with branded retail locations in the past, and it has a handful of Microsoft stores around the country, but the response from consumers has been underwhelming. (From tech bloggers, it’s been downright derisive.) Being able to sell products under an existing, well-run and admired brand’s umbrella would be a good solution.

Analysts also speculate Microsoft could create products designed specifically for the e-reader market. The deal “rais[es] the question of whether MSFT will develop additional mobile devices that can enhance the sale of ebooks,” Fassler wrote. The Nook currently runs on the open-source Android operating system.

With Circuit City long gone and Best Buy planning a future of fewer and smaller stores, Barnes Noble could be an attractive alternative for Microsoft, especially if it had more control over the sales process than it would via a third-party channel. ”If something was to ever happen to Best Buy… people still need to buy electronics, so where are they going to go?” O’Donnell said. “Maybe there’s an interesting opportunity for Barnes Noble.”

More

Microsoft takes a stake in Barnes Noble’s Nook

Barnes Noble, Sunoco among hot stocks

 

Article source: http://pheedo.msnbc.msn.com/click.phdo?i=9f9cd490f828fb9ed1427eca6e147bb9

Two girls hit by car while sunbathing in road

Monday, April 30th, 2012

Two teen girls were struck by a car after they dozed off while sunbathing on a rural road in Pennsylvania on Sunday afternoon, family members told NBC station WPXI-TV in Pittsburgh.

The girls, both 13, were taken by helicopter to Children’s Hospital in Pittsburgh, where they were expected to recover.


Andrea Kunicky, a spokeswoman for the hospital, told msnbc.com on Monday that the girls were in good condition.

Police told WTAE-TV that Samantha Schermanhorn and Kaylie George were sunbathing on the road when a 19-year-old male cousin of Schermanhorn made a turn at a stop sign and hit the girls. The name of the driver has not been released.

Though he was questioned by police, it was unclear if he would be charged. Economy Borough police were investigating the case. The sergeant in charge of the investigation was not immediately available for comment to msnbc.com.

Nicole and Nicholas Beck, who identified their brother as the driver, told WTAE that it was “just an accident.”

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

Article source: http://pheedo.msnbc.msn.com/click.phdo?i=9acad372279009193b8b8d19f30a9282

103 dead after ferry sinks in India

Monday, April 30th, 2012

Reuters

Map of the ferry sinking in India

An overloaded double-decked ferry carrying mostly farmers and their families capsized in the Dhubri district of the northeastern Indian state of Assam on Monday, killing at least 103 people, police said.

About 100 people were rescued from the ship carrying about 300 passengers, which sank during a storm in the Brahmaputra River, Assam police chief Jayanta Narayan Choudhury told Reuters.

Reports on the number of dead and missing varied immediately after the accident.

People were sitting on the roof of the ferry when it tipped over in a storm in a remote region of the state, close to China and Bangladesh, police said.


“Our rescue efforts have been hampered by bad weather, it is still raining heavily and there is almost zero visibility in the area,” P.C. Saloi, a police officer at the scene, told Reuters. Rescue operations were called off late at night and were set to begin again at sun up.

Eyewitnesses told police the vessel was old and broke in two after capsizing in the swollen river, one of Asia’s largest. Smaller boats often get into trouble on the river, but the ferry was the largest to sink in recent years.

“I could see people being swept away as the river current was very strong,” a witness, Rahul Karmakar, told AFP.

The boat was overloaded with people and sacks of rice, among other goods, and carried no lifeboats or life jackets, the police officer told Reuters..

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who represents Assam in the upper house of parliament, said he was “shocked and grieved” by the accident.

Rescue workers said they had contacted colleagues downstream in Bangladesh to help in the search for survivors. 

Reuters contributed to this report.

More world news from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow us on Twitter: @msnbc_world

Article source: http://pheedo.msnbc.msn.com/click.phdo?i=b11145562c06d462dd990c3bc6de8a86

Senior EPA official resigns over ‘crucify’ comments

Monday, April 30th, 2012

Saying he had become a distraction, a senior Environmental Protection Agency official who used the word “crucify” to describe how the EPA enforced laws in the oil industry resigned on Monday.

“My continued service will distract you and the agency,” Al Armendariz said in his resignation letter to EPA chief Lisa Jackson.

“I regret comments I made several years ago that do not in any way reflect my work as regional administrator,” Armendariz said in his letter.

Armendariz, who was head of the EPA’s South Central office, came under fire from Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., who was informed of the two-year-old video last week and launched an inquiry.


Inhofe on Monday welcomed the resignation but said the EPA’s “crucifixion philosophy” continues.

“His choice of words revealed the truth about the war that EPA has been waging on American energy producers under President Obama,” Inhofe said in a statement.

The EPA, in response to a request from msnbc.com, said that Jackson had accepted the resignation. “I respect the difficult decision he made and his wish to avoid distracting from the important work of the agency,” Jackson said in a statement.

In the video, Armendariz answers a question about enforcement policies. In the Middle Ages, he told the audience, the Romans conquered a village by taking “the first five guys they saw and they’d crucify them.”

He added that the EPA, similarly, makes “examples out of people who are not complying with the law … you make examples out of them, use it as a deterrent method.

“Companies that are smart see that and they don’t want to play that, and they decide at that point that it’s time to clean up,” he added.

Armendariz had been speaking to residents of Dish, Texas, a town where some are concerned about potential environmental impacts from a drilling technique called hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.

A senior Obama administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject, told The Associated Press that Armendariz has received death threats since the video surfaced.

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

 

Article source: http://pheedo.msnbc.msn.com/click.phdo?i=4d511676ab2000f38c67732f768ee5e1

Zimmerman lawyer starts social media effort

Monday, April 30th, 2012

3 hrs.

Gary W. Green / Pool / EPA

George Zimmerman, center, speaks with his attorney Mark O’Mara during an April 20 bond hearing at the Seminole County Courthouse in Sanford, Fla.

George Zimmerman’s attorney has launched an all-out social media campaign on behalf of his client, accused of second-degree murder in the killing of Trayvon Martin.

That social media effort includes a Facebook page, a website and a Twitter account on behalf of Zimmerman.

“We understand that it is unusual for a legal defense to maintain a social media presence on behalf of a defendant, but we also acknowledge that this is a very unusual case,” says Zimmerman attorney Mark O’Mara on the new site, George Zimmerman Legal Case

The American Bar Association’s standards of professional conduct does not deal with social media, a spokesman for the ABA told msnbc.com, but “it’s certainly going to be on everyone’s radar screen” now.

Stephen A. Saltzburg, a member of the ABA’s governing body, the House of Delegates, and former chairman of the ABA’s criminal justice section, said ”generally speaking, lawyers are not supposed to be making public statements that could compromise a fair trial.” 

Whether the Zimmerman social media effort will do that would be up to a judge, Saltzburg said.

“Social media is kind of a new thing. I suspect judges in highly publicized cases are going to think about trying to order lawyers and defendants to stay away from social media in order not to taint the jury pool.”

Zimmerman started his own website, “The Real George Zimmerman,” April 9, two days before he was arrested and charged with Martin’s murder. In the two weeks the site was up, Zimmerman raised $204,000 before O’Mara shut that site down.

O’Mara said last week that money now has been put into an account that can’t be accessed directly by Zimmerman or his family.

“We have worked to shut down all of Mr. Zimmerman’s websites and social profiles,” O’Mara said on the new site. “It is not in Mr. Zimmerman’s best interests to speak publicly about this case, and as he has hired us to represent him, we feel part of our responsibility to our client is to provide a voice for Mr. Zimmerman, but only when it is appropriate to do so.”

msnbc.com

The attorney said on the new site he understands and acknowledges “the criticism that this is an opportunistic move using the event of a tragedy for personal or firm gain. Rest assured, that if the controversy surrounding this matter subsided tomorrow, so would our efforts to address the perceived problems the way we feel is necessary.”

But social media, he said, cannot be ignored “in this day and age … It is now a critical part of presidential politics, it has been part of revolutions in the Middle East, and it is going to be an unavoidable part of high-profile legal cases, just as traditional media has been and continues to be. We feel it would be irresponsible to ignore the robust online conversation, and we feel equally as strong about establishing a professional, responsible, and ethical approach to new media.”

The defense team hopes to disrupt “misinformation” about the case, which they believe is rife. “There is a tremendous volume of conversation on the Internet regarding news about this case. Some of it is based on fact; some is opinion and speculation; some is rumor; and some is malicious misinformation. We are in a position to distinguish (when appropriate) fact from the rest,” O’Mara said on the site. 

But some would say the defense is not in a position to distinguish fact “from the rest,” as it is not the judge or the jury. 

O’Mara also made clear on the website that the defense team “cannot and will not comment about the facts of the case, as that is the purpose of the courts and legal process. Part of our presence online is to discourage public speculation about the facts of the case.”

How the defense will both distinguish the facts of the case without commenting on those facts may be quite tricky. We tried reaching O’Mara at his office, and will update this story if we hear back.

The Facebook page, George Zimmerman Legal Case, shows a photo of a cozy-looking house. (It’s not Zimmerman’s; it’s O’Mara’s office in Orlando, Fla.) 

On the page, people are welcome to comment about the case, but, said O’Mara, “we have begun removing posts that we feel are inappropriate, and if you find your post has disappeared, it is likely for one of the following reasons.” Among them: “profane and/or racially charged language,” “speculation about the facts of the case which must and will only be discussed in a court of law,” “aggressively disparaging or unfairly critical of people associated with the case,” and perhaps chillingly, those that “contained a threat.”

msnbc.com

“We will not remove posts simply because they are critical of George Zimmerman or his legal defense,” O’Mara says on the page.

A Twitter account, GZlegalCase, is also up and running; a legal defense fund website is in the works. 

“We do intend to raise funds on behalf of our client, and when we are approved to do so, we will accept funds online,” O’Mara said on the George Zimmerman Legal Case site. “We understand that this is controversial, but Mr. Zimmerman deserves a fair trial, and mounting a defense is an expensive proposition.”

Check out Technolog, Gadgetbox, Digital Life and In-Game on Facebook, and on Twitter, follow Suzanne Choney.

3 days

DJ Pauly D

Twitter as truth machine: How celebs and journalists spread bin Laden death news

4 days

Obama

CISPA veto could protect privacy, say experts, but Congress presses ahead

6 hrs.

Rosa Klouchebag

How annoying are you on Twitter? A new site will tell you

Close post

Article source: http://pheedo.msnbc.msn.com/click.phdo?i=f99e63ccdd8c6d6b6ff049c53dd2d62c

Brown: I’m not the reason Whitney’s gone

Monday, April 30th, 2012

In his first interview since the death of Whitney Houston, Bobby Brown exclusively tells TODAY’s Matt Lauer, “I’m not the reason she’s gone.”

NBC

In a candid sit-down set to air Wednesday, Brown, who says he’s “very much clean and sober from narcotics,” talks to Lauer about the last time he saw Houston, how he found out about her death, and why he gets blamed for her drug use. He talks about his relationship with their daughter, Bobbi Kristina, and addresses recent rumors and controversy surrounding her personal life. And Thursday, speaking publicly for the first time, three of Brown’s children and his fiancée tell TODAY how they feel about the media’s portrayal of Brown. 

When asked about the last time he saw Houston, a week or so before she died, Brown says the iconic singer “had this glow about her that was just, you know, incredible. I’m saying to myself, you know, ‘She must be … she must be doing really well,’ because she looked really well.”

Brown says Houston, to whom he was married for 15 years, “looked like she was in a good place.”

Video: Coroner says Houston took drugs before drowning

Lauer asks Brown how he took the news that cocaine was a likely contributor to the death of Houston, 48, who was found in a bathtub in a Beverly Hills hotel on Feb. 11.

“I was hurt. I was hurt … because, you know, me being off of narcotics for the last seven years, I felt that she was, you know, I didn’t know she was struggling with it still. But at the same time, you know, listen, it’s a hard fight.  It’s a hard fight to, you know, maintain sobriety that way.”

Based on his own feelings and how she appeared when he last saw her, Brown theorizes that that one day of cocaine use — not the effects of longterm use — was enough to kill Houston. “It had to be that one, because that’s all it takes,” Brown said. “One hit, you know … it could definitely take your life away from you. And, unfortunately, that was it.”

Lauer pressed the 43-year-old RB star on the talk after Houston’s death. “If I heard it once, I heard it a hundred times, and I know you heard it too,” Lauer said. “Fans, people who say they were close to Whitney, say her life went downhill when she met Bobby Brown. How does it make you feel when you hear it?”

“It makes me feel terrible,” Brown said. “But you know, I know differently. I think if anyone ever knew us, if anybody ever spent time around us instead of time lookin’ through the bubble, they would know how we felt about each other. They would know how happy we were together.”

Video: Houston’s hairstylist opens up about star’s death

Brown says the couple got a wakeup call from starring in the reality TV series “Being Bobby Brown.” “We looked at the bubble and saw ourselves. We was able to see what other people were saying about us, you know? We was able to see that our drug use had affected our relationship, had affected the love that we felt for each other.”

But when asked by Lauer about the popular perception that he is the one responsible for getting Houston hooked on drugs, Brown says, “not true.”

“I didn’t get high [on narcotics] before I met Whitney,” Brown said. “I smoked weed, I drank the beer, but no, I wasn’t the one that got Whitney on drugs at all.” He says drugs were a part of the singer’s life “way before” they got together.

“It’s just … it’s just unexplainable how one could, you know, [say that I] got her addicted to drugs. I’m not the reason she’s gone,” Brown said.

NBC

Video: Star-studded sendoff for Whitney Houston

In the second part of Lauer’s interview, which will air Thursday, the TODAY host talks with three of Brown’s children — Landon, Bobby Jr., and La’Princia — and his fiancée, Alicia Etheridge.

The children all say the public perception of their father is not the right one.

“I honestly feel like my dad’s a great person,” daughter La’Princia said. “He’s been my best friend, like, my whole life. If I ever have a problem with anything, I know I can always go to him. Likewise, if he ever needs to talk to somebody, he knows he can always call me and I’ll be there for him.”

Son Landon says people confuse his father’s stage persona with the real man. “I feel like my father’s always had the bad boy image. So, you know, they just keep followin’ that. Anything that they can take a negative from the situation, they blow it out of proportion and blame him.”

Video: Details emerge about Houston’s final days

La’Princia says everyone makes mistakes.

“They don’t see the good part of him that we see every single day. Everyone goes through their ups and downs. You can’t be judged forever about one event in your life or just the bad decisions you’ve made, you can’t always be judged just by that.”

How do you feel about Bobby Brown’s view of Whitney Houston and his take on people’s perception of him? Discuss on Facebook.

Related content:

Article source: http://pheedo.msnbc.msn.com/click.phdo?i=bc025851cf09642f8338228f48a671b8

Koalas get some protection in parts of Australia

Monday, April 30th, 2012

The face of Australia on Monday got some needed protection in parts of the country. While nearly a plague in South Australia, the iconic koala was listed as “vulnerable” in Queensland and New South Wales due to crashing numbers, dwindling habitat and other threats.

“On a species as iconic as the koala, I really don’t think I could have credibly said to the Australian people, ‘Oh don’t worry, you might not have any more in Queensland the way things are going, but you can go to South Australia if you want to see one’,” Environment Minister Tony Burke told reporters of his decision.

“In Victoria and South Australia, koalas have actually been in such high numbers they’ve been eating themselves out of habitat,” the Australian Broadcasting Corp. quoted him as saying. “There’s what you call population control measures going on there … like sterilization.”


“But in places like NSW and Queensland,” he added, “their numbers have been taking a massive hit” — a 40 percent drop in Queensland and a decline of about a third in New South Wales over the last 20 years.

PhotoBlog: Threats to an iconic species

While not listed as “endangered” — the most threatened status — the vulnerable listing will still provide protections.

“If someone wants to make a development there is a tougher hurdle as a result of a species being endangered,” Burke said.

Besides habitat loss and urban development, koalas face threats from vehicle strikes, dog attacks, and disease, Burke said.

The Australian Koala Foundation welcomed the listing, but argued that the population in Victoria is much less than the government estimates and should also be protected.

The foundation “is shocked and saddened that the koalas in Victoria have been left unprotected,” Foundation Director Deborah Tabart said in a blog post. “It is disheartening to read that the minister has fallen for the old and sad myth that koalas in Victoria have ‘eaten themselves out of house and home’.”

Koalas are the cute fuzzy bears possibly most famous for being from Australia. Now, for the first time, the Dallas Zoo will be home to two – Kibo and Tekin.

Whereas the Australian government estimates there are 200,000 koalas across the country, the foundation believes the number is around 100,000.

Tabart told the Australian Broadcasting Corp. that she felt Victoria was left out due to industry pressure.

“Because I have been in my job for so long and I sat through the Senate inquiries last year, I know industry is afraid of a listing and I know they have lobbied very hard,” she said. “The logging industry, the development industry and forestry all pleaded with the senators last year, please do not list.”

Reuters contributed to this report.

More world news from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow us on Twitter: @msnbc_world

Article source: http://pheedo.msnbc.msn.com/click.phdo?i=1ee13612d69e524c6d8aa7162d53bf10

Obama challenges Romney on past comments on bin Laden

Monday, April 30th, 2012

 

President Obama escalated a war of words with Republican foe Mitt Romney, challenging the former Massachusetts governor to explain his 2007 comments suggesting that it might not be worth leveraging all U.S. resources to find Osama bin Laden.

The president denied that he or the United States were engaged in “excessive celebration” to mark the one-year anniversary of the mission that ended successfully with bin Laden’s assassination at a safe haven in Pakistan.

Yuri Gripas / Reuters

President Obama denied that he or the United States were engaged in “excessive celebration” to mark the one-year anniversary of the mission that ended successfully with bin Laden’s assassination at a safe haven in Pakistan.

“I hardly think that you have seen any excessive celebration taking place here,” the president said at the White House. “And I think for us to use that time for some reflection, to give thanks to those who participated is entirely appropriate, and that’s what’s been taking place.”

Obama continued, making no mention of Romney by name, but clearly intending to put his general election opponent on the spot, while taking a degree of credit for the mission.

Obama said in response:

As far as my personal role and what other folks would do, I’d just recommend that everybody take a look at people’s previous statements in terms of whether they thought it was appropriate to go into Pakistan and take out bin Laden.

I assume that people meant what they said when they said it. That’s been at least my practice. I said that I’d go after bin Laden if we had a clear shot at him and I did.

If there are others who have said one thing and now suggest they’d do something else, then I’d go ahead and let them explain it.

That was an unmistakable reference toward Romney’s 2007 comments to the Associated Press that “it’s not worth moving heaven and earth spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person,” meaning bin Laden.

Those comments have become part of a bit of political gamesmanship surrounding the anniversary of the bin Laden mission, as Obama’s re-election campaign works to win the president credit for his decision to authorize the risky mission.

Romney said after an event this morning in New Hampshire that “of course” he would have given the order to authorize the bin Laden mission. “Even Jimmy Carter would have given that order,” said the former Massachusetts governor.

The Obama campaign has used Romney’s 2007 remarks, though, to imply that Romney wouldn’t have given that order.

“I also think it’s worthwhile to make sure that, as we’re heading into this general election … the American people know where Mitt Romney did stand on it. It’s not exploitation, it’s fact,” Obama’s deputy campaign manager, Stephanie Cutter, told Andrea Mitchell this afternoon on MSNBC. “Mitt Romney … said he wouldn’t have gone into Pakistan to pursue bin Laden with actionable intelligence if the Pakistanis wouldn’t get him [bin Laden]. And he also said he wouldn’t move heaven and earth to get bin Laden. Well, the president did move heaven and earth.”

Andrea Mitchell talks with Stephanie Cutter, Team Obama’s Deputy Campaign Manager, about the Obama campaign’s newest video touting the President’s successful operation against bin Laden one year ago, and the criticism the campaign is facing because of it.

Article source: http://pheedo.msnbc.msn.com/click.phdo?i=3ae276ddf870b33851727deff3c45b59

Judge: Texas can’t omit Planned Parenthood

Monday, April 30th, 2012

NBC’s Andrea Mitchell talks with Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood, about the latest piece of legislation out of Texas that would block funding for the state’s Planned Parenthood centers.

A federal judge on Monday blocked a Texas rule that would have excluded Planned Parenthood from participating in the state’s women’s health program.

In a win for Planned Parenthood, U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel ruled Monday there was sufficient evidence the state rule barring Planned Parenthood is unconstitutional. He imposed a temporary injunction against enforcing it until he can hear full arguments.


The rule forbids state agencies from providing funds to an organization affiliated with abortion providers. It was set to go into effect on Tuesday.

In response to the new rule, eight Planned Parenthood clinics that don’t provide abortions sued the state. The clinics say the law unconstitutionally restricts their freedom of speech and association.

In granting the preliminary injunction, Planned Parenthood can continue to serve women, and getting reimbursed by the state, according to the Austin Statesman.

“The court is particularly influenced by the potential for immediate loss of access to necessary medical services by several thousand Texas women,” Yeakel said in a 24-page ruling.

The preliminary injunction is a big win for Planned Parenthood, which has been under siege in several states by abortion opponents. In the past year alone, states including Wisconsin, North Carolina, Tennessee and Indiana, in addition to Texas, have all moved to block Planned Parenthood from receiving taxpayer money.

“For many women, we are the only doctor’s visit they will have this year,” Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement. “This ruling affirms what women have known all along: politics simply doesn’t have a place in women’s health.”

The state Health and Human Services Commission will comply with the order and will work with the state attorney general to determine its next steps, spokeswoman Stephanie Goodman said.

“We remain confident that federal law gives states the right to establish criteria for Medicaid providers,” Goodman said.

Texas Governor Rick Perry and some Republican lawmakers have said they would rather eliminate the women’s healthcare program entirely than direct money to Planned Parenthood clinics.

The Texas program, which is part of the federal-state Medicaid program, provides cancer screenings, birth control and other health services to more than 100,000 low-income women.

The program does not pay for abortions or allow abortion providers to participate in the program. The new Texas state rule would ban program money from going to affiliates of abortion providers.

State law has included that ban on affiliates since the program began in 2007, but the state did not enforce it. Texas notified the federal government last year that it intended to begin enforcing the ban, effectively excluding Planned Parenthood from the program.
According to Planned Parenthood, about 49 percent of the women who received services through the program in 2010 obtained some services through a Planned Parenthood provider. Planned Parenthood said it would lose about $13.5 million of annual funding for preventive care and family planning if the rule is applied, forcing it to close clinics and lay off staff.

Texas has already made deep cuts in other family-planning programs. As a result, state subsidies that once provided low-cost birth control to 220,000 women a year now cover fewer than 60,000 women a year.

The federal government pays for 90 percent of the cost of the Texas Women’s Health Program, which serves low-income women of reproductive age who do not qualify for regular Medicaid coverage. Texas puts up just $4 million a year.

Critics object to Planned Parenthood receiving taxpayer money, which cannot be used to provide abortions, arguing that a steady stream of government grants provide an indirect subsidy by helping pay utility bills and keep doctors on staff.

Planned Parenthood is the nation’s largest abortion provider, terminating about 330,000 pregnancies a year.

It gets about a third of its revenue – $360 million in 2009 – from government grants to provide birth control, gynecological exams and care for sexually transmitted diseases to low-income women.

The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

Article source: http://pheedo.msnbc.msn.com/click.phdo?i=e1ef5dc17a81395eaed488a668c5c1b6